| From: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Move 'long long' check to c.h |
| Date: | 2010-05-24 19:11:32 |
| Message-ID: | 201005242111.32622.meskes@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> I think the current coding is extremely fragile (if it indeed works at
> all) because of its assumption that <limits.h> has been included
Well, this is the case in the code so far.
> already. In any case, we have configure tests that exist only for the
> benefit of contrib modules, so it's hard to argue that we shouldn't have
> one that exists only for ecpg.
>
> I think we should fix this (properly) for 9.0.
Ok, I don't mind fixing it properly for 9.0. Will do so as soon as I find time.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
ICQ 179140304, AIM/Yahoo/Skype michaelmeskes, Jabber meskes(at)jabber(dot)org
VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-05-24 19:12:09 | Re: Exposing the Xact commit order to the user |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-05-24 19:11:28 | Re: pg_upgrade docs |