From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade docs |
Date: | 2010-05-24 19:11:28 |
Message-ID: | 201005241911.o4OJBS725566@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
> > I have updated the paragraph to be:
> >
> > Upgrading from PostgreSQL 8.3 has additional restrictions not present
> > when upgrading from later PostgreSQL releases. For example,
> > pg_upgrade will not work for a migration from 8.3 if a user column
> > is defined as:
> >
> > Can you suggest other wording?
>
> hmm that seems better thanks, however I just noticed that we don't have
> a "general limitations" section. The way the docs are now done suggests
> that there are not limitations at all (except for the two warnings in
> the migration guide). Is pg_upgrade really up to the point where it can
> fully replace pg_dump & pg_restore independent of the loaded (contrib)
> or even third party modules(like postgis or custom datatypes etc)?
Yea, that's about right. I can add limiations if you want. ;-)
The only open pg_upgrade items are the ones on our TODO list:
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo
(I can't give you a URL hash-reference to the section because it doesn't
work on Firefox and no one seems to be able to fix it.)
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Meskes | 2010-05-24 19:11:32 | Re: [PATCH] Move 'long long' check to c.h |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2010-05-24 19:11:11 | Re: ExecutorCheckPerms() hook |