Re: Exposing the Xact commit order to the user

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Exposing the Xact commit order to the user
Date: 2010-05-24 19:12:09
Message-ID: AANLkTinmiaGBI95OGnBWZUiyivAEeVhSLTZEMwpQwLMT@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> It'd be nice to have as a side effect, but if not, IMHO this proposal
> could simply use a fixed buffer pool like all other slru.c callers until
> someone gets around to fixing that.  Adding more GUC switches for this
> strikes me as overkill.

I agree.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hector Beyers 2010-05-24 19:16:23 Hiding data in postgresql
Previous Message Michael Meskes 2010-05-24 19:11:32 Re: [PATCH] Move 'long long' check to c.h