Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Andrew Chernow wrote:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Silently not locking is surely
> >> not very safe.
> >>
> >
> > Here is the dump code version of the patch. If anyone wants the
> > return value idea, let me know.
>
> So is this a patch we want applied?
Please see my other thread about libpq thread-locking which should be
finished before this one, after which this patch will change. So no,
this is not the version to be applied.
//Magnus