Re: libpq Win32 Mutex performance patch

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: libpq Win32 Mutex performance patch
Date: 2008-05-13 20:06:14
Message-ID: 20080513200614.GM6966@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Andrew Chernow wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Silently not locking is surely
>> not very safe.
>>
>
> Here is the dump code version of the patch. If anyone wants the return
> value idea, let me know.

So is this a patch we want applied?

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2008-05-13 20:14:48 Re: libpq Win32 Mutex performance patch
Previous Message Dave Page 2008-05-13 16:15:12 Re: odd output in restore mode