Quick Links

Re: libpq Win32 Mutex performance patch

From:	Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com>
To:	Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc:	pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject:	Re: libpq Win32 Mutex performance patch
Date:	2008-04-11 19:24:29
Message-ID:	47FFBAED.7030100@esilo.com
Views:	Raw Message \| Whole Thread \| Download mbox \| Resend email
Thread:
Lists:	pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
>Silently not locking is surely
> not very safe.
>

Here is the dump code version of the patch. If anyone wants the return
value idea, let me know.

--
Andrew Chernow
eSilo, LLC
every bit counts
http://www.esilo.com/

Attachment	Content-Type	Size
win32_mutex.patch	text/plain	1.9 KB

In response to

Re: libpq Win32 Mutex performance patch at 2008-04-11 19:00:08 from Tom Lane

Responses

Re: libpq Win32 Mutex performance patch at 2008-04-11 21:52:23 from Andrew Chernow
Re: libpq Win32 Mutex performance patch at 2008-04-21 11:51:10 from Magnus Hagander
Re: libpq Win32 Mutex performance patch at 2008-05-13 20:06:14 from Alvaro Herrera

Browse pgsql-patches by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Teodor Sigaev	2008-04-11 19:38:01	Re: Remove lossy-operator RECHECK flag?
Previous Message	Andrew Chernow	2008-04-11 19:11:26	Re: libpq Win32 Mutex performance patch