| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: libpq Win32 Mutex performance patch |
| Date: | 2008-05-21 14:25:30 |
| Message-ID: | 20080521162530.20028a0c@mha-laptop.hagander.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Andrew Chernow wrote:
> > > Tom Lane wrote:
> > >> Silently not locking is surely
> > >> not very safe.
> > >>
> > >
> > > Here is the dump code version of the patch. If anyone wants the
> > > return value idea, let me know.
> >
> > So is this a patch we want applied?
>
> Please see my other thread about libpq thread-locking which should be
> finished before this one, after which this patch will change. So no,
> this is not the version to be applied.
I've applied a version of this to make libpq use CRITICAL_SECTION on
win32.
//Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Yoshiyuki Asaba | 2008-05-21 14:34:22 | Re: [HACKERS] WITH RECURSIVE patch V0.1 |
| Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2008-05-21 12:25:29 | Re: WITH RECURSIVE patch V0.1 |