Re: new psql \d command

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: new psql \d command
Date: 2003-08-07 15:28:35
Message-ID: 200308071528.h77FSZ007673@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> Hi guys (tom),
>
> Just reminding people that there was a question regarding my changes to
> psql's \d command. I'm not sure if everyone wanted all the identifier
> names double quoted or not...

I assume we don't want them always quoted.

> And are people happy with the layout in general? Also, I think it'd be
> nice if my recent patch to use the new pg_get_viewdef was applied for
> release (I think it's merely a bug fix).

It is in the queue to be applied.

> It might be a bit risky getting pg_dump to use it though?

I don't think we every want pg_dump to use it --- better accurate than
pretty in there. There seems to be some tough assumptions that have to
be made in that function that are better used for visual-only cases.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Pflug 2003-08-07 15:53:11 Re: new psql \d command
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-08-07 15:23:00 Re: new psql \d command