Re: new psql \d command

From: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: new psql \d command
Date: 2003-08-07 16:00:48
Message-ID: 3F3277B0.8010906@pse-consulting.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:

>It might be a bit risky getting pg_dump to use it though?
>
>
>
>I don't think we every want pg_dump to use it --- better accurate than
>pretty in there.
>
Agreed.

> There seems to be some tough assumptions that have to
>be made in that function that are better used for visual-only cases.
>
>
Still, if there's something not precise, it should be cleared. Which
tough assumptions are made that seem doubtful to you?

Regards,
Andreas

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-08-07 16:08:19 Re: new psql \d command
Previous Message Andreas Pflug 2003-08-07 15:53:11 Re: new psql \d command