| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: new psql \d command |
| Date: | 2003-08-07 16:08:19 |
| Message-ID: | 200308071608.h77G8JQ12097@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andreas Pflug wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> >It might be a bit risky getting pg_dump to use it though?
> >
> >
> >
> >I don't think we every want pg_dump to use it --- better accurate than
> >pretty in there.
> >
> Agreed.
>
> > There seems to be some tough assumptions that have to
> >be made in that function that are better used for visual-only cases.
> >
> >
> Still, if there's something not precise, it should be cleared. Which
> tough assumptions are made that seem doubtful to you?
It just seemed complex to figure out which operators needed parens and
which didn't.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-08-07 16:22:30 | Re: new psql \d command |
| Previous Message | Andreas Pflug | 2003-08-07 16:00:48 | Re: new psql \d command |