| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: new psql \d command |
| Date: | 2003-08-07 15:23:00 |
| Message-ID: | 200308071523.h77FN0h07070@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> > It might be a bit risky getting pg_dump to use it though?
>
> I definitely don't want pg_dump using the pretty-print stuff ;-).
> I'm neutral on whether to use it in psql's \d commands.
I thought the pretty-printing stuff was designed specifically for psql
\d and third-party apps like pgadmin.
Let's face it, the non-pretty-printing output is "pretty" ugly, and
pretty-printing will improve that.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-08-07 15:28:35 | Re: new psql \d command |
| Previous Message | ohp | 2003-08-07 15:20:58 | Re: 7.4beta1 build problem on unixware |