Re: [GENERAL] PGXLOG variable worthwhile?

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PGXLOG variable worthwhile?
Date: 2002-09-19 04:48:33
Message-ID: 20020919014334.I53125-100000@hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Yea, but you aren't going to be needing to know the xlog directory that
> way, will you?

Why not? Who are you to tell me how my scripts work, or how they get
their information? I have a script that runs to tell me how much disk
space each instance is using up, that parses the ps output for the -D
argument ... having -X there would allow me to parse for that as well and,
if it was in the ps output, add that appropriately into the calculations
...

My point is, the functionality is there, and should be documented properly
... encourage ppl to use the GUC setting in postmaster.conf, but just
because you can't grasp that some of us *like* to use command line args,
don't remove such functionality ...

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-09-19 04:50:54 Re: [GENERAL] PGXLOG variable worthwhile?
Previous Message Robert J. Sanford, Jr. 2002-09-19 03:35:50 I'm using it!

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-09-19 04:50:54 Re: [GENERAL] PGXLOG variable worthwhile?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-09-19 04:46:59 Re: The TODO List (Was: Re: Open 7.3 items)