Re: [GENERAL] PGXLOG variable worthwhile?

Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Yea, but you aren't going to be needing to know the xlog directory that
> > way, will you?
>
> Why not? Who are you to tell me how my scripts work, or how they get
> their information? I have a script that runs to tell me how much disk
> space each instance is using up, that parses the ps output for the -D
> argument ... having -X there would allow me to parse for that as well and,
> if it was in the ps output, add that appropriately into the calculations
> ...
>
> My point is, the functionality is there, and should be documented properly
> ... encourage ppl to use the GUC setting in postmaster.conf, but just
> because you can't grasp that some of us *like* to use command line args,
> don't remove such functionality ...

You ask for a vote and see if you can get votes to add -X. We had that
vote once already. We do make decisions on what people should use. If
not, we would be as hard to manage as Oracle.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073