Re: [GENERAL] PGXLOG variable worthwhile?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, <Pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PGXLOG variable worthwhile?
Date: 2002-09-19 21:37:17
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0209192024540.1307-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Marc G. Fournier writes:

> My point is, the functionality is there, and should be documented properly
> ... encourage ppl to use the GUC setting in postmaster.conf, but just
> because you can't grasp that some of us *like* to use command line args,
> don't remove such functionality ...

Top secret information: If it's made a GUC variable, it's automatically a
command-line option.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-09-19 21:44:19 Re: perl shared library, redux
Previous Message Cindy 2002-09-19 21:27:23 perl shared library, redux

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-09-19 21:37:48 Re: AIX compilation problems (was Re: Proposal ...)
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-09-19 21:36:53 Re: Beta2 on Friday Morning (Was: Re: Open 7.3 items)