From: | Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>, Mathijs Brands <mathijs(at)ilse(dot)nl>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-ports <pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-Admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris |
Date: | 2001-03-29 00:10:52 |
Message-ID: | 20010328161052.A9431@fw.wintelcom.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers pgsql-ports |
* Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> [010328 16:07] wrote:
> Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> writes:
> > FYI, the WU-FTPD code (2.6.0 or better) has a couple of more platforms
> > including UnixWare. The UnixWare code will need /dev/kmem permission to
> > change it's stuff, so I don't know whether we want to do this or not, but
> > if people are looking at the ps stuff, please look at this as well.
>
> Well, *I* sure wouldn't run Postgres with write permission on /dev/kmem.
> Especially not just to make ps_status work...
Wow... is this all for "pgmonitor"?
sorry, just my opinion...
If it for pgmonitor then you guys ought to just mark it broken on
these platforms, the non-"ps based" solution could have been
implemented with all the time wasted trying to get the "ps based"
hack working. :(
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net|alfred(at)freebsd(dot)org]
Daemon News Magazine in your snail-mail! http://magazine.daemonnews.org/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-03-29 00:12:39 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris |
Previous Message | Mathijs Brands | 2001-03-29 00:07:39 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-03-29 00:12:39 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris |
Previous Message | Mathijs Brands | 2001-03-29 00:07:39 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-03-29 00:12:39 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris |
Previous Message | Mathijs Brands | 2001-03-29 00:07:39 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris |