Re: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net>
Cc: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>, Mathijs Brands <mathijs(at)ilse(dot)nl>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-ports <pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-Admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris
Date: 2001-03-29 00:14:27
Message-ID: 20685.985824867@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers pgsql-ports

Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net> writes:
> If it for pgmonitor then you guys ought to just mark it broken on
> these platforms, the non-"ps based" solution could have been
> implemented with all the time wasted trying to get the "ps based"
> hack working. :(

My thoughts exactly ;-) ... I'm willing to give advice about this,
but not to do any legwork myself.

PS status display does have some utility with or without pgmonitor,
but not enough to do a lot of work for.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-03-29 00:14:35 Re: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-03-29 00:14:00 Re: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-03-29 00:14:35 Re: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-03-29 00:14:00 Re: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris

Browse pgsql-ports by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-03-29 00:14:35 Re: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-03-29 00:14:00 Re: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris