Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Mathijs Brands <mathijs(at)ilse(dot)nl>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-ports <pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-Admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris
Date: 2001-03-29 00:12:39
Message-ID: 20643.985824759@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers pgsql-ports

Mathijs Brands <mathijs(at)ilse(dot)nl> writes:
> mathijs 297 0.1 0.2 6120 3352 pts/1 S 01:59:18 0:00 /opt/pgsql/bin/./postgres mathijs localhost template1 idle

The interesting point about this is that the 7.0.3-on-2.7 installation
*is* managing to change its PS display. So either Solaris 2.8
retrogressed (different predefined symbols maybe?), or we broke the code
since 7.0.3.

Anyway I think the right thing to look at is why the 7.1 install is not
managing to update the display.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-03-29 00:12:45 Re: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris
Previous Message Alfred Perlstein 2001-03-29 00:10:52 Re: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-03-29 00:12:45 Re: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris
Previous Message Alfred Perlstein 2001-03-29 00:10:52 Re: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris

Browse pgsql-ports by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-03-29 00:12:45 Re: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris
Previous Message Alfred Perlstein 2001-03-29 00:10:52 Re: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris