Re: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
Cc: Mathijs Brands <mathijs(at)ilse(dot)nl>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-ports <pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-Admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris
Date: 2001-03-28 23:51:13
Message-ID: 20482.985823473@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers pgsql-ports

Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> writes:
> FYI, the WU-FTPD code (2.6.0 or better) has a couple of more platforms
> including UnixWare. The UnixWare code will need /dev/kmem permission to
> change it's stuff, so I don't know whether we want to do this or not, but
> if people are looking at the ps stuff, please look at this as well.

Well, *I* sure wouldn't run Postgres with write permission on /dev/kmem.
Especially not just to make ps_status work...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Larry Rosenman 2001-03-28 23:54:13 Re: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-03-28 23:48:27 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Larry Rosenman 2001-03-28 23:54:13 Re: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-03-28 23:48:27 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris

Browse pgsql-ports by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Larry Rosenman 2001-03-28 23:54:13 Re: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-03-28 23:48:27 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris