Re: [HACKERS] PATCH for pgconnection.h

> On Thu, 8 Jul 1999, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > I think the proper solution is to add a configure-time test to see
> > whether a namespace declaration is needed. We could use configure to
> > see whether we need ".h" on the end of C++ include file references, too.
> > (That's another thing that's going to be site-dependent for a while to
> > come.)
>
> Hmmm. I'm running 2.7.2.1 here and in the case of <string> I have a
> file called: /usr/include/g++/string <-- note there's no .h on the end.
> Am I being dense here and missing something or does this differ from what
> other folks have? There's also a number of other files without the .h
> extension in that directory. string includes std/string.h.
>

We remove .h, and someone complains, we add .h, and someone complains,
but fewer people. Configure is the answer.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026