Re: [HACKERS] PATCH for pgconnection.h

From: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Brian P Millett <bpm(at)ec-group(dot)com>, postgres <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PATCH for pgconnection.h
Date: 1999-07-08 15:04:12
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.05.9907081100020.28563-100000@paprika.michvhf.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 8 Jul 1999, Tom Lane wrote:

> I think the proper solution is to add a configure-time test to see
> whether a namespace declaration is needed. We could use configure to
> see whether we need ".h" on the end of C++ include file references, too.
> (That's another thing that's going to be site-dependent for a while to
> come.)

Hmmm. I'm running 2.7.2.1 here and in the case of <string> I have a
file called: /usr/include/g++/string <-- note there's no .h on the end.
Am I being dense here and missing something or does this differ from what
other folks have? There's also a number of other files without the .h
extension in that directory. string includes std/string.h.

Vince.
--
==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: vev(at)michvhf(dot)com flame-mail: /dev/null
# include <std/disclaimers.h> TEAM-OS2
Online Campground Directory http://www.camping-usa.com
Online Giftshop Superstore http://www.cloudninegifts.com
==========================================================================

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-07-08 15:28:58 Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO list
Previous Message Lamar Owen 1999-07-08 14:44:39 [Fwd: [HACKERS] Re: Postgresql 6.5-1 rpms on RedHat 6.0]