Re: [SQL] Index on Type Numeric

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Steven Bradley <sbradley(at)llnl(dot)gov>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [SQL] Index on Type Numeric
Date: 1999-07-09 03:59:27
Message-ID: 199907090359.XAA07523@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> At 01:05 AM 7/8/99 -0400, you wrote:
> >> I get the same for indexing TIMESTAMP in version 6.4.2. Has this been
> >> fixed in 6.5?
> >>
> >
> >No. DATETIME works, though.
>
>
> Not really, since I need to access it from JDBC and the
> ResultSet.getTimestamp() method doesn't work with DATETIME columns (at
> least under my installation of 6.4.2).
>
> Thanks, anyway.
>

Peter, we are getting requests for DATETIME in jdbc. Can you add it?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-07-09 04:01:27 Re: [HACKERS] "24" < INT_MIN returns TRUE ???
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-07-09 03:56:36 Re: [HACKERS] PATCH for pgconnection.h