From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Steven Bradley <sbradley(at)llnl(dot)gov> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [SQL] Index on Type Numeric |
Date: | 1999-07-09 03:59:27 |
Message-ID: | 199907090359.XAA07523@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> At 01:05 AM 7/8/99 -0400, you wrote:
> >> I get the same for indexing TIMESTAMP in version 6.4.2. Has this been
> >> fixed in 6.5?
> >>
> >
> >No. DATETIME works, though.
>
>
> Not really, since I need to access it from JDBC and the
> ResultSet.getTimestamp() method doesn't work with DATETIME columns (at
> least under my installation of 6.4.2).
>
> Thanks, anyway.
>
Peter, we are getting requests for DATETIME in jdbc. Can you add it?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-07-09 04:01:27 | Re: [HACKERS] "24" < INT_MIN returns TRUE ??? |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-07-09 03:56:36 | Re: [HACKERS] PATCH for pgconnection.h |