From: | "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Postgres General List" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: max time in a table query takes ages |
Date: | 2008-10-23 10:48:57 |
Message-ID: | 162867790810230348m38baf1i9121eae8622894d7@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hello
try VACUUM and REINDEX
regards
Pavel Stehule
2008/10/23 Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> hey folks
>
> I have a simple query over a fairly simple query here, that scans for max
> date in a table that's fairly hudge (300M rows). there's index on that field
> that's being used, but for whatever reason, it takes ages. Ideas ?
>
> select date_trunc('day', max(data)) into dt from staticstats where
> processed = false
>
> explain analyze:
>
> QUERY PLAN
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Result (cost=3.89..3.90 rows=1 width=0) (actual
> time=2558459.883..2558459.884 rows=1 loops=1)
> InitPlan
> -> Limit (cost=0.00..3.89 rows=1 width=8) (actual
> time=2558362.751..2558362.753 rows=1 loops=1)
> -> Index Scan Backward using sstats_date_idx on staticstats
> (cost=0.00..1566198296.88 rows=402561795 width=8) (actual
> time=2558362.747..2558362.747 rows=1 loops=1)
> Filter: ((data IS NOT NULL) AND (NOT processed))
> Total runtime: 2558540.800 ms
> (6 rows)
>
> Time: 2558545.012 ms
>
> one thing I am amazed by, is the filter data is not null, well - take a look
> at the schema here:
>
> staty=> \d+ staticstats
> Table "public.staticstats"
> Column | Type | Modifiers | Description
> -----------+--------------------------------+------------------------------------------------------+-------------
> data | timestamp(0) without time zone | not null |
> size | integer | not null default 0 |
> proto | integer | not null |
> macfrom | integer | not null |
> macto | integer | not null |
> processed | boolean | not null default false |
> id | bigint | not null default nextval('sstatic_id_seq'::regclass) |
> Indexes:
> "blah123s" PRIMARY KEY, btree (macto, data, proto, macfrom)
> "sstats_id_idx" UNIQUE, btree (id)
> "sstats_date_idx" btree (data)
> "staticstat_processed_idxs" btree (processed)
> Foreign-key constraints:
> "staty_fk1s" FOREIGN KEY (macfrom) REFERENCES macs(id)
> "staty_fks" FOREIGN KEY (macto) REFERENCES macs(id)
> Has OIDs: no
>
> it takes ms if there's somethign that's been recently added to that table.
> The table itself is vacuumed/analyzed quite often, and more or less
> clustered by sstats_date_idx - althrough in that instance, I wasn't able to
> recluster it - because there's not enough disc space (only 45GB free, and
> for whatever reason - even tho the table is only about 25GB in size -
> postgresql requires more than 40GB of space to recluster it).
>
> any hints please ?
>
> --
>
> GJ
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Guettler | 2008-10-23 11:00:37 | Re: Shopping cart |
Previous Message | Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz | 2008-10-23 10:22:43 | max time in a table query takes ages |