| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>, mhh(at)mindspring(dot)com, Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1 |
| Date: | 2000-11-10 16:39:29 |
| Message-ID: | 11664.973874369@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> When we implement schemas, then all objects belonging to the
> DEFINITION_SCHEMA will not be dumped, all other objects will be. At least
> I imagine that this might be something to work with.
That's a thought, although it still doesn't cope with the issue of
"what if I've altered a standard system object?" ... which is what
I think Mark was getting at yesterday. I'm not sure there's any
reasonable way to handle that, though, short of diff'ing against a
dump of template1 :-(
To bring this back from future nice solutions to the reality of what
to do today, do people like the "template0" solution for now (7.1)?
I can work on it if so.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-11-10 16:49:14 | Re: AW: Could turn on -O2 in AIX |
| Previous Message | Zeugswetter Andreas SB | 2000-11-10 16:34:35 | AW: Could turn on -O2 in AIX |