Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1

From: Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>, mhh(at)mindspring(dot)com, Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1
Date: 2000-11-15 09:31:28
Message-ID: 200011150931.EAA01508@jupiter.jw.home
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> To bring this back from future nice solutions to the reality of what
> to do today, do people like the "template0" solution for now (7.1)?
> I can work on it if so.

Go for it.

Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2000-11-15 11:09:00 Re: Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' function language names
Previous Message carl garland 2000-11-15 08:40:28 Re: [HACKERS] Re: PHPBuilder article -- Postgres vs MySQL