Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1

From: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: mhh(at)mindspring(dot)com, Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1
Date: 2000-11-11 03:44:29
Message-ID: 3.0.5.32.20001111144429.02b86bc0@mail.rhyme.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At 11:39 10/11/00 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>To bring this back from future nice solutions to the reality of what
>to do today, do people like the "template0" solution for now (7.1)?
>I can work on it if so.
>

Being able to create a vanilla DB is essential to make pg_dump work with
customized templates, and I can't think if a better solution. So yes, it's
definitely a good idea.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Philip Warner 2000-11-11 04:26:11 Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1
Previous Message Alfred Perlstein 2000-11-11 03:19:25 Re: RE: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/backend/access/transam ( xact.c xlog.c)