Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: mhh(at)mindspring(dot)com, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1
Date: 2000-11-10 16:24:54
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0011101722570.775-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Philip Warner writes:

> I think both this and the OID-wrap problem will be permanent features until
> we have a non-oid-based dump procedure. Pretty much every piece of metadata
> needs some kind of 'I am a system object, don't dump me' flag.

When we implement schemas, then all objects belonging to the
DEFINITION_SCHEMA will not be dumped, all other objects will be. At least
I imagine that this might be something to work with.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zeugswetter Andreas SB 2000-11-10 16:34:35 AW: Could turn on -O2 in AIX
Previous Message Dirk Lutzebaeck 2000-11-10 15:13:13 Re: Must a C state transition function use palloc on the returned value?