Re: Possible old and fixed bug in Postgres?

From: Steve Rogerson <steve(dot)git(at)woodsideendurance(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: pgsql-general list <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Possible old and fixed bug in Postgres?
Date: 2023-04-05 15:02:28
Message-ID: 06e8753f-2254-438a-406c-a12a9354b540@woodsideendurance.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 05/04/2023 11:23, Erik Wienhold wrote:
> Judging by the commit message and changed test cases, probably:
>
> https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=921d749bd4c34c3349f1c254d5faa2f1cec03911
>
That's the one. I can't see which pg version(s) this turned up in.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ian Lawrence Barwick 2023-04-05 15:04:57 Re: Possible old and fixed bug in Postgres?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-04-05 14:24:45 Re: PgOutput Replication Message Format - Differentiate between explicit NULL and Omitted Columns during Insert