Re: Possible old and fixed bug in Postgres?

From: Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Steve Rogerson <steve(dot)git(at)woodsideendurance(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-general list <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Possible old and fixed bug in Postgres?
Date: 2023-04-05 15:04:57
Message-ID: CAB8KJ=iUcXgdDO_Znb1aMQeUV6fQk+6+9xh9xdzHjutwh+Ajfg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

2023年4月6日(木) 0:02 Steve Rogerson <steve(dot)git(at)woodsideendurance(dot)co(dot)uk>:
>
> On 05/04/2023 11:23, Erik Wienhold wrote:
> > Judging by the commit message and changed test cases, probably:
> >
> > https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=921d749bd4c34c3349f1c254d5faa2f1cec03911
> >
> That's the one. I can't see which pg version(s) this turned up in.

$ git tag --contains 921d749bd4c34c3349f1c254d5faa2f1cec03911 | head -1
REL8_0_0

Regards

Ian Barwick

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2023-04-05 15:07:59 Re: Possible old and fixed bug in Postgres?
Previous Message Steve Rogerson 2023-04-05 15:02:28 Re: Possible old and fixed bug in Postgres?