Re: Possible old and fixed bug in Postgres?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Steve Rogerson <steve(dot)git(at)woodsideendurance(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-general list <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Possible old and fixed bug in Postgres?
Date: 2023-04-05 15:07:59
Message-ID: 1850732.1680707279@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Steve Rogerson <steve(dot)git(at)woodsideendurance(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> That's the one. I can't see which pg version(s) this turned up in.

The pg_time_t change was in 8.0, the later one to support 64-bit tzdata
was in 8.4.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Louis Tian 2023-04-06 06:21:34 UPSERT in Postgres
Previous Message Ian Lawrence Barwick 2023-04-05 15:04:57 Re: Possible old and fixed bug in Postgres?