| From: | Erik Wienhold <ewie(at)ewie(dot)name> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Steve Rogerson <steve(dot)git(at)woodsideendurance(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-general list <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> | 
| Subject: | Re: Possible old and fixed bug in Postgres? | 
| Date: | 2023-04-05 10:23:18 | 
| Message-ID: | 2134938884.639895.1680690198796@office.mailbox.org | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general | 
> On 05/04/2023 11:18 CEST Steve Rogerson <steve(dot)git(at)woodsideendurance(dot)co(dot)uk> wrote:
>
> I was looking at perl CPAN Module (DateTime::Format::Pg) and saw that it did 
> something that seemed odd to me with time zones, based on the comment:
>
>      # For very early and late dates, PostgreSQL always returns times in
>      # UTC and does not tell us that it did so.
>
> Early is before 1901-12-14 and late after 2038-01-18
>
> A quick test setting my time zone to be America/Chicago I got
>
> select '1900-01-01 00:00:00'::timestamptz;
>        timestamptz
> ------------------------
>   1900-01-01 00:00:00-06
> (1 row)
>
> and
>
> select '2040-01-01 00:00:00'::timestamptz;
>        timestamptz
> ------------------------
>   2040-01-01 00:00:00-06
>
>
> These seemed correct to me. I'm guessing this might have been a bug/feature of 
> pg in the long ago.
Judging by the commit message and changed test cases, probably:
--
Erik
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2023-04-05 14:16:56 | Re: Possible old and fixed bug in Postgres? | 
| Previous Message | Steve Rogerson | 2023-04-05 09:18:43 | Possible old and fixed bug in Postgres? |