Re: Should we add debug_parallel_query=regress to CI?

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should we add debug_parallel_query=regress to CI?
Date: 2025-03-05 18:34:12
Message-ID: uol3yr63qxf5sne4yqx5fvbfx2nz5m3cef7yv2dm32oo5lyoc2@xwzcttg6ds6s
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2025-03-05 13:10:00 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > On 2025-03-05 12:29:15 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I think this does need to be documented somewhere/somehow, just so
> >> that people don't waste time focusing on "it's failing on FreeBSD"
> >> when the actual cause is some other thing we happened to load
> >> onto that task.
>
> > 0002 is a first draft for one way to do this.
>
> Works for me.

Cool. Thanks for looking at it.

Pushed both patches.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2025-03-05 18:40:28 Re: Make tuple deformation faster
Previous Message Álvaro Herrera 2025-03-05 18:32:35 Re: new commitfest transition guidance