Re: Should we add debug_parallel_query=regress to CI?

From:	Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To:	Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc:	Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject:	Re: Should we add debug_parallel_query=regress to CI?
Date:	2025-03-05 18:41:20
Message-ID:	CAH2-Wz=5QoyFjGCmBDXnsD2KCrnakA2nhu=3CfXB+V5CEEXiKw@mail.gmail.com
Views:	Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:	2025-03-05 16:06:10 from Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>  2025-03-05 16:10:03 from Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>  2025-03-05 16:19:46 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>   2025-03-05 17:16:20 from Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> 📎    2025-03-05 17:29:15 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>     2025-03-05 18:03:16 from Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> 📎      2025-03-05 18:10:00 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>       2025-03-05 18:34:12 from Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>        2025-03-05 18:41:20 from Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Lists:	pgsql-hackers

In response to

• Re: Should we add debug_parallel_query=regress to CI? at 2025-03-05 18:34:12 from Andres Freund

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Sami Imseih	2025-03-05 18:45:30	track generic and custom plans in pg_stat_statements
Previous Message	Jeff Davis	2025-03-05 18:40:28	Re: Make tuple deformation faster