From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Should we add debug_parallel_query=regress to CI? |
Date: | 2025-03-05 18:10:00 |
Message-ID: | 334945.1741198200@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2025-03-05 12:29:15 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think this does need to be documented somewhere/somehow, just so
>> that people don't waste time focusing on "it's failing on FreeBSD"
>> when the actual cause is some other thing we happened to load
>> onto that task.
> 0002 is a first draft for one way to do this.
Works for me.
> Of course this still requires somebody analyzing a failure to look at
> cirrus.tasks.yml, but I don't know if we can do a whole lot about that?
If it's far away from the actual task-spec code it probably won't
get maintained very well, so putting it here seems OK to me.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2025-03-05 18:11:51 | Re: making EXPLAIN extensible |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2025-03-05 18:03:16 | Re: Should we add debug_parallel_query=regress to CI? |