Re: Should we add debug_parallel_query=regress to CI?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should we add debug_parallel_query=regress to CI?
Date: 2025-03-05 18:10:00
Message-ID: 334945.1741198200@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2025-03-05 12:29:15 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think this does need to be documented somewhere/somehow, just so
>> that people don't waste time focusing on "it's failing on FreeBSD"
>> when the actual cause is some other thing we happened to load
>> onto that task.

> 0002 is a first draft for one way to do this.

Works for me.

> Of course this still requires somebody analyzing a failure to look at
> cirrus.tasks.yml, but I don't know if we can do a whole lot about that?

If it's far away from the actual task-spec code it probably won't
get maintained very well, so putting it here seems OK to me.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2025-03-05 18:11:51 Re: making EXPLAIN extensible
Previous Message Andres Freund 2025-03-05 18:03:16 Re: Should we add debug_parallel_query=regress to CI?