Re: doc: Mention clock synchronization recommendation for hot_standby_feedback

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>
Cc: Jakub Wartak <jakub(dot)wartak(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: doc: Mention clock synchronization recommendation for hot_standby_feedback
Date: 2024-12-05 15:17:12
Message-ID: qric5wndzfsjhrpzzkav7ehjlzbjfojbmxkhwz5ewfch4vnple@bfozwm5rb6zc
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2024-12-05 12:06:41 -0300, Euler Taveira wrote:
> Is it worth a WARNING message if there is a "huge" time difference
> between the servers? We already have the reply time in the message so
> it is a matter of defining the "huge" interval plus a roundtrip. We also
> need to avoid spamming the log.

IME folks who have huge time differences between the servers are not going to
look at the log carefully enough to see such a warning.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2024-12-05 15:23:23 Re: code contributions for 2024, WIP version
Previous Message Robert Haas 2024-12-05 15:12:53 Re: Proposal: Role Sandboxing for Secure Impersonation