| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl> |
| Cc: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Eric Hanson <eric(at)aquameta(dot)com>, Wolfgang Walther <walther(at)technowledgy(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal: Role Sandboxing for Secure Impersonation |
| Date: | 2024-12-05 15:12:53 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmobHqRy3O27kSkp8ZE8-u22rbV3pY_CsgAB=fNYXb+cNfQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Dec 4, 2024 at 5:54 PM Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl> wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Dec 2024 at 22:05, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > I do think the protocol change is better.
>
> Fully agreed. But I now also know the herculean amount of effort
> that's necessary for that to happen, and I personally don't have the
> bandwidth to push that through anymore. So I'm definitely open to a
> SQL way if there's a safe way to achieve that.
I'm not convinced it has to be a Herculean amount of effort. Why do
you think otherwise?
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2024-12-05 15:17:12 | Re: doc: Mention clock synchronization recommendation for hot_standby_feedback |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2024-12-05 15:11:11 | Re: MinGW compiler warnings in ecpg tests |