Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft

From: PFC <lists(at)boutiquenumerique(dot)com>
To: pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com
Cc: "Gary Doades" <gpd(at)gpdnet(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft
Date: 2005-01-11 01:24:47
Message-ID: opskezjlb7th1vuj@musicbox
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance


> I'm curious, why do you think that's serious ? What do you really expect

Simply because I don't like VB non .NET, but C# is a much much better
language, and even VB.NET is decent.

> to do in the stored procedure ? Anything of consequence will seriously
> degrade performance if you select it in say a million rows.

Well, if such a thing needed to be done, like processing a lot of rows to
yield a small result set, it certainly should be done inside the server,
but as another poster said, being really careful about memory usage.

But, that was not my original idea ; I find that even for small functions
plsql is a bit ugly compared to the usual suspects like Python and others
; unfortunately I think there is overhead in converting the native
postgres datatype to their other language counterparts, which is why I did
not try them (yet).

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Miles Keaton 2005-01-11 02:42:13 which dual-CPU hardware/OS is fastest for PostgreSQL?
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2005-01-11 00:04:37 Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft