| From: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pierre-Frédéric Caillaud <lists(at)boutiquenumerique(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Gary Doades <gpd(at)gpdnet(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft |
| Date: | 2005-01-10 21:31:40 |
| Message-ID: | 41E2F43C.5020702@fastcrypt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
I'm curious, why do you think that's serious ? What do you really expect
to do in the stored procedure ? Anything of consequence will seriously
degrade performance if you select it in say a million rows.
Pierre-Frédéric Caillaud wrote:
>> The .NET Runtime will be a part of the next MS SQLServer engine. You
>> will be able to have C# as a pl in the database engine with the next
>> version of MSSQL. That certainly will be something to think about.
>
>
> Ah, well, if it's C# (or even VB.NET) then it's serious !
> I thought postgres had pl/java ?
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>
>
--
Dave Cramer
http://www.postgresintl.com
519 939 0336
ICQ#14675561
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gary Doades | 2005-01-10 21:55:57 | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft |
| Previous Message | Gary Doades | 2005-01-10 20:44:47 | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft |