| From: | Doug McNaught <doug(at)wireboard(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Mark Coffman" <mark(at)epilogue(dot)net> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: VACUUM vs VACUUM ANALYZE |
| Date: | 2001-10-19 00:06:11 |
| Message-ID: | m3itdco5n0.fsf@belphigor.mcnaught.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
"Mark Coffman" <mark(at)epilogue(dot)net> writes:
> I know the differences between VACUUM and VACUUM ANALYZE have been discussed
> before, but I'd like to know how you schedule your cleaning jobs. Right now
> I do a
>
> VACUUM
> VACUUM ANALYZE
>
> every hour... it takes about 3 minutes to run both. Should I run ANALYZE
> less often?
ANALYZE includes regular VACUUM functionality, so you don't have to do
both. So you're probably down to 2 minutes now. ;)
There's nothing wrong with running every hour--it depends on the
size and activity level of your DB.
-Doug
--
Let us cross over the river, and rest under the shade of the trees.
--T. J. Jackson, 1863
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2001-10-19 00:28:54 | Re: Large Files? |
| Previous Message | Richard Welty | 2001-10-19 00:04:09 | Re: Accessing PostgreSQL through Apache and PHP4 on Linux |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-10-19 00:51:07 | Re: PQstatus() detect change in connection... |
| Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2001-10-18 23:49:15 | Re: VACUUM vs VACUUM ANALYZE |