Re: Large Files?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)atentus(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Large Files?
Date: 2001-10-19 00:28:54
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.33L2.0110182118360.7821-100000@aguila.protecne.cl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, Tom Lane wrote:

> 7.2 will have a better approach to pg_log maintenance ...

Are you referring to your proposal to "survive transaction-ID
wraparound"
(http://archives2.us.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2001-08/msg00457.php)
or something else?

Is this thing (or whatever it has mutated into) already done?

--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[(at)]atentus(dot)com>)
"La libertad es como el dinero; el que no la sabe emplear la pierde" (Alvarez)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-10-19 00:56:57 Re: Large Files?
Previous Message Doug McNaught 2001-10-19 00:06:11 Re: VACUUM vs VACUUM ANALYZE