| From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mark Coffman <mark(at)epilogue(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: VACUUM vs VACUUM ANALYZE |
| Date: | 2001-10-18 23:49:15 |
| Message-ID: | 20011019094915.A10169@svana.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 02:33:06PM -0400, Mark Coffman wrote:
> I know the differences between VACUUM and VACUUM ANALYZE have been discussed
> before, but I'd like to know how you schedule your cleaning jobs. Right now
> I do a
>
> VACUUM
> VACUUM ANALYZE
vacuum analyze does a vacuum anyway, so you don't need both.
> every hour... it takes about 3 minutes to run both. Should I run ANALYZE
> less often?
Here we do it once per day, though after a major set of updates i run it
manually. We're not under heavy load though.
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Magnetism, electricity and motion are like a three-for-two special offer:
> if you have two of them, the third one comes free.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Doug McNaught | 2001-10-18 23:55:10 | Re: Can not input large text data |
| Previous Message | Mitch Vincent | 2001-10-18 23:35:39 | Re: To Postgres Devs : Wouldn't changing the select limit |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Doug McNaught | 2001-10-19 00:06:11 | Re: VACUUM vs VACUUM ANALYZE |
| Previous Message | Mitch Vincent | 2001-10-18 23:35:39 | Re: To Postgres Devs : Wouldn't changing the select limit |