From: | Doug McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>, "Don V(dot) Soledad" <don(dot)soledad(at)uratex(dot)com(dot)ph>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: decrypted pwd |
Date: | 2003-09-08 16:32:45 |
Message-ID: | m3he3n1brm.fsf@varsoon.wireboard.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
"scott.marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>
> > It is probably worth trying to spend some time trying to find a finite
> > set of passwords that are guarenteed to be generators for all possible
> > MD5 hashes (or at least those than can possibly occur), so that you can
> > finish the computation in finite time.
>
> If I rememberate correctificantly, it would take more storage than all the
> atoms in the universe to store all the possible md5 sigs. Or somthing
> similarly large. But if it's an excuse to buy a massive storage array,
> I'm all for it. :-)
I think Bruno was making a funny... :)
-Doug
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | scott.marlowe | 2003-09-08 16:57:06 | Re: Does "vacuum analyze" contain "vacuum"? |
Previous Message | Matthew T. O'Connor | 2003-09-08 16:24:31 | Re: Does "vacuum analyze" contain "vacuum"? |