| From: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> |
| Cc: | <holger(at)marzen(dot)de>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Does "vacuum analyze" contain "vacuum"? |
| Date: | 2003-09-08 16:57:06 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33.0309081052400.11666-100000@css120.ihs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 8 Sep 2003, Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-09-07 at 08:04, Holger Marzen wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > the docs are not clear for me. If I want (in version 7.1.x, 7.2.x) to
> > help the analyzer AND free unused space do I have to do a
> >
> > vacuum
> > vacuum analyze
> >
> > or is a
> >
> > vacuum analyze
>
> vacuum analyze = vacuum + analyze
>
> FYI, I don't remember it if was added in 7.2, or 7.3, but you can now
> do:
7.2 for sure had analyze. I'm still using it in production (although it
is getting a bit long in the tooth nowadays)
Looking at the docs for 7.1, it didn't.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ron Johnson | 2003-09-08 17:32:25 | Re: decrypted pwd |
| Previous Message | Doug McNaught | 2003-09-08 16:32:45 | Re: decrypted pwd |