Re: decrypted pwd

From: Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>
To: PgSQL General ML <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: decrypted pwd
Date: 2003-09-08 17:32:25
Message-ID: 1063042345.17023.427.camel@haggis
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 11:32, Doug McNaught wrote:
> "scott.marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> writes:
>
> > On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> >
> > > It is probably worth trying to spend some time trying to find a finite
> > > set of passwords that are guarenteed to be generators for all possible
> > > MD5 hashes (or at least those than can possibly occur), so that you can
> > > finish the computation in finite time.
> >
> > If I rememberate correctificantly, it would take more storage than all the
> > atoms in the universe to store all the possible md5 sigs. Or somthing
> > similarly large. But if it's an excuse to buy a massive storage array,
> > I'm all for it. :-)
>
> I think Bruno was making a funny... :)

But any true geek will look for *any* excuse to buy more hardware.

Also, if I remember properly, the estimates are that there are 10^70
atoms in the known Universe. That equates to ~2^233.

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ron Johnson, Jr. ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net
Jefferson, LA USA

"Knowledge should be free for all."
Harcourt Fenton Mudd, Star Trek:TOS, "I, Mudd"

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Franco Bruno Borghesi 2003-09-08 17:48:51 Re: SRF question
Previous Message scott.marlowe 2003-09-08 16:57:06 Re: Does "vacuum analyze" contain "vacuum"?