| From: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Darren Duncan <darren(at)darrenduncan(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: deprecating contrib for PGXN |
| Date: | 2011-05-18 19:27:55 |
| Message-ID: | m21uzvn70k.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"David E. Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> writes:
> Yes. But if they're that decoupled, then they ought to be in separate
> distributions.
I somehow fail to picture how you map distributions with debian
packages. The simple way is to have a distribution be a single source
package that will produce as many binary packages as it contains
extensions.
Now, if a single extension appears in more than one distribution, as far
as debian packaging is concerned, you're hosed.
So I still think we need to manually package for debian…
Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marko Kreen | 2011-05-18 19:29:08 | Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default? |
| Previous Message | David E. Wheeler | 2011-05-18 19:23:18 | Re: deprecating contrib for PGXN |