| From: | Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default? |
| Date: | 2011-05-18 19:29:08 |
| Message-ID: | BANLkTi=efON_3EzxmGNRmLh+ogJEL8cR-Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 10:25, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> Some of my personal discussions of this topic have suggested that some other
>> popular extensions like pgcrypto and hstore get converted too. I think
>> those all fail test (3), and I'm not actually sure where pgcrypto adds any
>> special dependency/distribution issues were it to be moved to the main
>> database package. If this general idea catches on, a wider discussion of
>> what else should get "promoted" to this extensions area would be
>> appropriate. The ones I picked seemed the easiest to justify by this
>> criteria set.
>
> pgcrypto would cause trouble for any builds *without* SSL. I don't
> think any packagers do that, but people doing manual builds would
> certainly get different results.
What kind of trouble? It should work fine without SSL.
--
marko
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David E. Wheeler | 2011-05-18 19:36:04 | Re: deprecating contrib for PGXN |
| Previous Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2011-05-18 19:27:55 | Re: deprecating contrib for PGXN |