Re: deprecating contrib for PGXN

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Darren Duncan <darren(at)darrenduncan(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: deprecating contrib for PGXN
Date: 2011-05-18 19:23:18
Message-ID: 5EAB9329-C42C-4B22-B296-B1EC7C483CA0@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On May 18, 2011, at 3:22 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:

> If I include both version 1 and version 2 of an extension in one. And
> version 2 has more dependencies than version 1 (or the other way
> around). Then those dependencies will be required for version 1 as
> well...

Yes. But if they're that decoupled, then they ought to be in separate distributions.

Best,

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dimitri Fontaine 2011-05-18 19:27:55 Re: deprecating contrib for PGXN
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2011-05-18 19:22:31 Re: deprecating contrib for PGXN