| From: | wieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] A further thought on rule string size |
| Date: | 2000-02-28 07:22:06 |
| Message-ID: | m12PKVK-0003kGC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > Removing the labels would actually save code in readfuncs.c, which
> > wouldn't have to skip over them. In outfuncs.c, we could either
> > have every node-writing subroutine know about two output modes, or
> > make a post-pass that strips anything that looks like a field label.
> > The latter would be less maintenance work in the long run.
> >
> > Comments?
>
> If you could keep the labels just for EXPLAIN, go for it.
Not right now, put it onto TODO for after 7.0.
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#========================================= wieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) #
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jan Wieck | 2000-02-28 07:34:43 | Re: [HACKERS] update_pg_pwd trigger does not work very well |
| Previous Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2000-02-28 07:16:43 | RE: [HACKERS] Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN |