| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jan Wieck <wieck(at)debis(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] A further thought on rule string size |
| Date: | 2000-02-28 08:28:10 |
| Message-ID: | 200002280828.DAA19846@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > > Removing the labels would actually save code in readfuncs.c, which
> > > wouldn't have to skip over them. In outfuncs.c, we could either
> > > have every node-writing subroutine know about two output modes, or
> > > make a post-pass that strips anything that looks like a field label.
> > > The latter would be less maintenance work in the long run.
> > >
> > > Comments?
> >
> > If you could keep the labels just for EXPLAIN, go for it.
>
> Not right now, put it onto TODO for after 7.0.
But we just required initdb for lztext. If we need another initdb
later, maybe we should do it?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jan Wieck | 2000-02-28 08:28:29 | Re: [HACKERS] A further thought on rule string size |
| Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2000-02-28 08:13:38 | Re: [HACKERS] update_pg_pwd trigger does not work very well |