| From: | wieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Jan Wieck <wieck(at)debis(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] A further thought on rule string size |
| Date: | 2000-02-28 08:28:29 |
| Message-ID: | m12PLXZ-0003kGC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > > If you could keep the labels just for EXPLAIN, go for it.
> >
> > Not right now, put it onto TODO for after 7.0.
>
> But we just required initdb for lztext. If we need another initdb
> later, maybe we should do it?
LZTEXT was a fairly limited change, tested out before and
just reapplied. This time you ask for mucking with the family
of node-print and -read functions. Even if it's a limited
area of code affected, I don't feel comfortable doing it now.
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#========================================= wieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) #
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jose Soares | 2000-02-28 08:44:57 | Re: [GENERAL] AW: [HACKERS] TRANSACTIONS |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-02-28 08:28:10 | Re: [HACKERS] A further thought on rule string size |