Re: [HACKERS] A further thought on rule string size

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] A further thought on rule string size
Date: 2000-02-27 23:49:29
Message-ID: 200002272349.SAA10668@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Removing the labels would actually save code in readfuncs.c, which
> wouldn't have to skip over them. In outfuncs.c, we could either
> have every node-writing subroutine know about two output modes, or
> make a post-pass that strips anything that looks like a field label.
> The latter would be less maintenance work in the long run.
>
> Comments?

If you could keep the labels just for EXPLAIN, go for it.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-02-27 23:54:34 Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN
Previous Message Keith Parks 2000-02-27 23:42:00 Rogue line in regression resultmap file.